Study seeks genetic link for Lumbees, heart disease
by Sara Hottman, Staff writer
5 months ago | 1559 views | 18 18 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
LUMBERTON — Doctors have long seen a trend among Lumbee patients with cardiovascular diseases: They tend to be younger and female, defying the typical risk population of older men. Now Duke Medical researchers have the green light to start looking for genetic links in that anomaly, which they hope will lead to effective prevention measures.

“In finding a link, it may be possible to develop a blood test that could be performed at an early age that could tell us if a person was at risk for premature cardiac artery disease,” said Dr. Terry Lowry, a cardiovascular surgeon at Southeastern Regional Medical Center. “Then we could start aggressive primary prevention measures.”

Lowry’s grandmother, a Lumbee, had coronary artery disease and had several heart attacks.

“I grew up in the area, and so I’m well aware of the numbers of people who have premature bypass surgery,” said Lowry, a Prospect native.

Cardiovascular disease is the No. 1 cause of death in Western societies, representing 40 percent of all deaths in the United States — more than all cancer deaths combined, according to the Mayo Clinic. Cardiovascular disease encompasses coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, and congenital heart defects.

Usually men are more at risk of heart disease; a person’s risk increases with age, and people with a family history of cardiovascular diseases are more likely to suffer from one. There are also a number of lifestyle factors: smoking, poor diet, obesity, physical inactivity, poor hygiene and high stress.

Centers for Disease Control statistics show that Robeson County has among the highest heart disease hospitalization and mortality rates in North Carolina, ranked 95th of 100 counties for the number of people hospitalized for heart-related diseases each year and 92nd for annual deaths from heart disease.

“Duke has cared for the Lumbee population for years through local clinics. CVD usually runs in a whole family, or they develop symptoms,” said Amy Kessenich, director of the Southeastern Heart Center and manager of Duke Medical in Lumberton.

The Duke Medical study is looking for genetic links to premature coronary artery disease among Lumbees in hopes of reducing the number of people in their 30s and 40s who have bypass surgeries, Lowry said.

“It’s something that the cardiologists at Duke have been looking at for a while,” Lowry said. Lowry said he met with cardiologists interested in doing the study before SRMC’s Heart Center opened in May 2006.

“We don’t know if (the Lumbee) population is predisposed, but we suspect it is hereditary,” Kessenich said.

Researchers will need 1,000 volunteers who meet the study’s requirements: Lumbees with at least two family members who have had cardiovascular disease; men must have been diagnosed by age 51 and women by age 56. Participants will give blood samples at the hospital or the Heart Center. After the blood test is submitted, researchers will check in with the patient occasionally, and a year later conduct a follow-up evaluation.

The research team spent more than a year writing the study proposal, which was approved by Duke and SRMC last month. One of the lead researchers, Dr. Svati Shah, and the Duke Genetic Department are sponsoring the study.

Shah is a cardiologist who has been investigating genetic links to cardiovascular diseases in Lumbees since she was involved in a Duke study that found Lumbees with heart problems often don’t match the usual risk population.

The study, presented at a 2006 meeting of the American College of Cardiology, found that 920 Lumbees hospitalized for heart problems not only had considerably higher rates of cardiovascular disease risk factors — diabetes, high blood pressure, history of coronary heart disease — than non-Lumbees, but also patients tended to be younger and female.

The study also found that while the mortality rate among Lumbee heart patients paralleled that of other ethnicities, Lumbees were more likely to have had at least one heart attack prior to the fatal heart attack. Despite their increased incidence, Lumbees had a lower rate of heart procedures to open clogged arteries, according to the study.

According to statistics compiled by the American Heart Association, men are more prone to heart-related diseases than women; black men and women are more prone to heart-related diseases than white men and women. Black men and women have higher incidences of high blood pressure and hypertension, and white people have higher incidences than Hispanic people.

Sickle cell anemia and cystic fibrosis are among the disorders with strong genetic links in certain ethnicities. Sickle cell anemia is most commonly found in black and Hispanic people, and cystic fibrosis mostly affects white people.

So far the strongest genetic link for cardiovascular disease is among family members. At John Hopkins, one of Shah’s alma maters, a research team found a strong hereditary link between siblings and heart disease. The study, published in November 2007, shows that siblings, regardless of age or lifestyle, have a higher risk of a heart attack or coronary artery disease if a sibling suffers one.

The study found that brothers are more strongly linked than sisters; the chance of a healthy brother developing a cardiovascular disease rises 20 percent within 10 years of his brother showing symptoms, while a sister’s chance rises 7 percent.

The younger the sibling who first develops a cardiovascular disease, the higher chance other brothers and sisters will develop similar problems, the study shows. Siblings who were obese increased their chance of heart-related diseases by 60 percent.

Researchers determined genetics played a role in cardiovascular disease, but the study did not reveal how genetics factored in; one researcher theorized people could be genetically vulnerable to risk factors — weight, age, gender, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol.

John Hopkins researchers shared Duke researchers’ current goal: To develop a blood test for people prone to cardiovascular disease in order to start prevention efforts early.

“This will help us to better understand what the precursor to CVD is so that we can prevent that for future generations,” Kessenich said.

To enroll in the study, contact Rachel Locklear at Southeastern Regional Medical Center, rl62@duke.edu or (910) 735-8807.
comments (18)
« osure wrote on Friday, Mar 12 at 11:08 AM »
Ross... your question was about race or genetics. I provided the correct answer.

By the way... speaking of questions, when are you going to answer mine on the other post?
« ROSSisRIGHT wrote on Thursday, Mar 11 at 08:25 PM »
"osure"... my goodness, my fingers are getting tired of explaining this. What did the study do? Did it "lean" toward one race?.... I win everytime the word "race" is involved. You may as well stop trying to argue race with me, remember I'm a Conservative Republican, we don't see race, ask Abraham Lincoln he was a republican also....
« osure wrote on Thursday, Mar 11 at 10:17 AM »
To answer your question, "COULD DIFFERENT RACES DEVELOP BETTER MORALS AND VALUES, BE SMARTER MORE INTELLIGENT AND EASIER TO TEACH BASED ON GENETIC BACKGROUNDS?" Based on GENETICS? No. Sounds like you are leaning toward one race being superior of all others.

Also sounds like you don't really understand what genetics mean.
« ROSSisRIGHT wrote on Thursday, Mar 11 at 05:42 AM »
Well,... you asked for it, and I'm gonna give it to ya. Cover your ears if you don't want ot hear this. You say "different races develop diseases based on genetic background". COULD DIFFERENT RACES DEVELOP BETTER MORALS AND VALUES, BE SMARTER MORE INTELLIGENT AND EASIER TO TEACH BASED ON GENETIC BACKGROUNDS?
« ROSSisRIGHT wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 08:27 PM »
Go back a thousand years (osure/gladto) and see where people came from. Africa, Europe, Japan, etc. Where you or your ancestors were born, originated, raised etc has an effect on skin color, hair color, eye color (sickness/diseases) and then it's morphed into the next generations... Ever seen a frog? You know what it was before it found dry land?... Is it the same color it once was? Hair? (I know it doesn't have hair) Skin? Eyes? Ask GOD if he made us different in the BEGINNING, other than male/female, and if you say yes, don't ever, EVER get angry again when you read or hear that "some groups/races are "smarter" than this/that group, or "raise kids better", or "more responsible" for their own lives than some. LOOK,... I'M TIRED OF TRYING TO GET EVERYBODY TO GET THE RACE CHIP OFF YOUR SHOULDERS, EITHER YOU WANT RACISM TO BE A THING OF THE PAST OR JUST SHUT-UP ABOUT IT. Society is growing very tired of it... Like a former criminal trying to better his life and everybody continues to treat him the same... he finally gives up being "mr. goody two shoes". Same with people trying to convince others they're not racist, sooner or later, they'll stop trying.
« GladToHearIt wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 11:49 AM »
From a genetic and medical viewpoint people are different and yes, race does play a role into it... Each race sadly has different health issues to be on the watch for...
« osure wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 09:56 AM »
Ross... you said, "You can't have it both ways, saying yes then saying we are different because of skin color." But that is wrong. It can be both ways. Yes, we are all from Adam and Eve and we are all the same in our soul. But we are different because of our skin color as well. How many NATURALLY blonde haired full blooded African Americans have you seen. I don't ever recall seeing any. It is just not part of their genetics. But genetics should be the only thing that makes us different. Our souls and our hearts should be the same.
« ROSSisRIGHT wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 06:14 AM »
Well, I've stated my point and I'm sticking to it. Culture not race. If Jesus was here today would you tell him we are not all from Adam and Eve? You can't have it both ways, saying yes then saying we are different because of skin color. We all bleed red, and we're the same color in the dark. The only reason we have differences in "fill in the blank" is because of culture. This is funny, minorities want racism to be a thing of the past. Ther's anger when news reports a crime and the race is given in the description, anger when gov't stats are in the news that shines a negative light on minorities, but in some info when race is involved, it's OK. Can't have it both ways... Either we're post racial or stop flapping around like a fish out of water when someone says something about race you don't like.
« GladToHearIt wrote on Monday, Mar 08 at 08:50 PM »
ROSSisRIGHT - I'm glad their studying the Native Amerian and if there is a underlying cause of hear disease I hope they find it... The government isn't making a issue out of it... Money is spent on different kinds of studies and I hope they continue to spend monney on health issues regardless of race involved... I have excellent health insurance and still have poor health - some of it is from my genetic background, my age and my lifestyle... I work hard and put in long hours at work... having health insurance doesn't guarentee good health...most of my family is wealthy, don't eat right or exercise and could take better care of themselves...there isn't any preconceived rasicm in the article..."people like me" are highly intelligent, college educated and has lived in most parts of the United States - I have been exposed to more cultures and environments than most - have you?... Your post states what I call a "word salad" - lots of words without a common thread...
« ROSSisRIGHT wrote on Monday, Mar 08 at 08:21 PM »
"gladtohearit".... We didn't make an issue "out of thin air", the us government did. And y'all wonder why I detest the government. It's this very reason. People like gladtohereit will read the study and think nothing of the blaton racism presented in this waste of money. Then along comes someone like me and osure discussing it, though we may not agree, and we're told "don't make an issue out of thin air"? We didn't, the government did! Been tellin you guys to watch how the government takes surveys, census, tax forms, and any other gov't form you (have to) fill out and divides this country with that information... This is a prime example, it has race, a poor county, sickness, and with that, you automatically think, "well if they were rich and not minorities they would have insurance and better health". Told ya.... Ross
« GladToHearIt wrote on Monday, Mar 08 at 04:31 PM »
Everyone has the right to their opinion... If you look elsewhere in the country - there are obese people everywhere. People who have health insurance still have health problems. Native Americans may be prone to heart disease - African-Americans are prone to sickle cell... Don't make a issue out of thin air...
« osure wrote on Monday, Mar 08 at 09:54 AM »
Ross... In a way you are right about a person's location. Move someone to a new location and if they live there long enough they will begin to act and talk like the people in their new surroundings. For instance a person moving from New York to Alabama may eventually lose their accent. But to say ALL diseases are based on culture and surroundings is wrong. One example is sickle cell anemia. That disease IS a predominantly racial disease. Surroundings has nothing to do with it.
« ROSSisRIGHT wrote on Monday, Mar 08 at 05:32 AM »
belleinrob, Sorry ma'm if this one hits a little close to home, I only tell it like it is. I'm like that little statue on the judges desk with the blindfold on. Don't see races, rich or poor... I just listen, evaluate and speak the truth. If you take 100 people out of their natural environment, say Florida and move them to Alaska, over time these people will develop characteristics that mirror the people who were born and raised there. The same for the sicknesses and diseases and fatty tissue that will develope because of the environment there in. So I reiterate my previous statement that any disease people contract is based on culture/environment/surroundings and not race. "stargun" is about right, when you don't get the good stuff over many generations(no matter what race) eventually disease will develop.
« stargun1 wrote on Sunday, Mar 07 at 08:52 PM »
hello

study to show thyself approved. hear the cause of cvd is diet. passed down from generations poor quality of food has to do with the ability to acquire more better stuff. hog fat makes things tastier. peas, butter beans, and biscuits with fatback meat. it had to be raised by the people cause we laid around without the good jobs... richer is healthier.
« Logan99 wrote on Sunday, Mar 07 at 07:42 PM »
This genetic study would be valuable. Heart disease is multifactorial, diet is one of many contributions. Race and sex are both important issues but exactly why has not been well worked out. It would also be worthwhile, as part of this study, to determine the origin of Lumbee genes. As with all groups, there is a mixture of genes from different groups. Assigning genes to a certain race such as Black or Caucasian is not valuable, often not possible, because the vast majority overlap. But, it is possible to get a sense of the geographic origin of one's ancestors. This might improve our understanding of the history of the Lumbee tribe as well as clarifying important health issues. With the recent news on the poor over all health in our community, this is critically important information.
« belleinrobco wrote on Sunday, Mar 07 at 03:46 PM »
Ross, typically I agree with you. However, most of the medical studies are conducted on white individuals. Really, how many Lumbees, or American Indians, are in NIH, CDC or other pharmaceutical studies?? God made us quite similar, but also quite different. That includes genetic makeup. Different diseases affect different races differently and also different sexes. For example, heart attack symptoms are completely different in men than they are in women. It's safe to consider that the cellular structure and changes can be different among the spectrum of races. Most medical studies are conducted on white people. You can ease up on this one....
« MrBob wrote on Sunday, Mar 07 at 01:40 PM »
There is no genetic link. the problem is the way people are living there lives. greasy fried southern food......yeah thats sure to clog some ateries. And the lack of fitness also contributes. Heres a way to save millions in research on this issue. Just tell people to get off their lazy butts, go to the gym, and eat healthy. I gotta agree with Ross, the way someone is brought up in the life will influence decisions when they get older.
« ROSSisRIGHT wrote on Sunday, Mar 07 at 09:13 AM »
How many here in Robeson county attend church? It's a very high number, right? Then we should believe we all came from Adam and Eve.. We are of one race, HUMAN. The only difference in HUMANS is skin color and culture. (how you were raised) Seems lately all we read is studies on this group or that group of people. Point it out to me if I missed it, but I don't ever (at least the last 30 years) recall a study done specifically on whites... I could've overlooked it, but there would have been some outrage from non-whites that would have allerted me to the study, I'm sure. All races pay taxes to the federal government, and a breakdown of the amounts, by race, wouldn't have many around here upset at all, so lets ease up on spending tax dollars on "different groups" and just study all. To start with, there's culture, and it's not race specific, it's how and where you were raised. The environment surrounding someone in the developement stages of ones life are the only factors that influence behavior, sickness, obesity, (yes, sickness and obesity, if your not taught proper diet, then..) intelligence, teenage pregnancy, drug use and whatever else Robeson county "leads the state" in. If you must have a study, start and end there... culture.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
Gasoline Prices
Sponsored By:

Recipes
Sponsored By: