Fatcow Icon
Is environment making us fat?
Dec 03, 2012 | 2921 views | 4 4 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Robeson County, population 134,000, is not only one of the largest rural counties in North Carolina but also tops the list as the biggest county within the state, BMI-wise. According to 2009 data from the CDC National Diabetes Surveillance System, nearly 40 percent of adult Robeson residents are obese compared with the national average of 25 percent.

Furthermore, Robeson is one of the few rural counties with big-city problems: 30 percent of residents living below the poverty line and one of the highest violent crime index rates in North Carolina.

Obesity researchers have found that there is a complex link between diet, physical activity and the environment. The environment is composed of social and physical elements such as safety, as well as the actual man-made structure and layout of buildings that comprise a town, city or community. Certain physical environmental designs, also known as the built environment, allow for and actually encourage physical activity by including wide sidewalks, bike paths, and pedestrian crosswalks in land development designs.

One of the first studies of its kind, conducted in 2003 for the Smart Growth America Surface Transportation Policy Project by Ewing and McCann, found that people who lived in more sprawling neighborhoods were more likely to have a higher BMI.

So what could be causing the staggering rates of obesity seen in Robeson County? Let’s turn a careful eye to the environmental factor. Many Robesonians, like many Americans, use a personal vehicle to get to desired destinations — the average Robesonian commute time is 27 minutes. The particularly high violent crime rates of the county also do not make it conducive for children to stay outside to play for longer periods or for adults to opt for walking or biking instead of taking their car.

In addition, the sprawl of Robeson County’s commercial-residential design creates yet another barrier for physical activity, since the distance between homes and points of interest such as the library, grocery store or shops can be fairly far from people’s homes.

How can we make opportunities for people to get active? The transportation infrastructure must first be in place and that can be achieved through a complete streets policy. A complete streets policy ensures that alternative forms of transportation, such as bicycling, walking and public transportation are considered wherever road infrastructure is being planned in new and existing communities. The desperate need for a complete streets policy is not only reflected in the obesity rates of Robeson County, but in the fact that only 16 percent of Robeson residents get the recommended amount of daily physical activity.

Furthermore, Robeson County is also the ninth-highest county for bicycle crashes and 11th-highest county for pedestrian crashes in North Carolina. To encourage physical activity and enhance safety, Robeson residents must have ample sidewalk and T-racked or median-protected bike lanes that allow for people to take alternative routes to their destinations.

Are our neighborhoods making us fat? The jury is still out as research is still forthcoming; however, the logic still stands: Safe communities with opportunities to commute by foot or bike encourage physical activity. With nearly half of Robeson County residents coping with obesity, a critical eye can easily be directed toward this county.

Robeson is not the only place in the nation that could benefit from a “built environment” re-haul. With 25 percent of American adults classified as obese, many communities across the nation should critically evaluate the built environment of their neighborhoods and consider a complete streets policy that would give their residents the opportunity to become more active.

Mieka Sanderson is a masters of Public Health candidate at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s School of Public Health in the Health Behavior Department.



Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
BBBD
|
December 03, 2012
Consuming more calories than are burned is what makes a person fat.

I found the "complete streets" section interesting. I've noticed a lot of residential areas in Lumberton don't even have sidewalks. Makes taking an evening stroll a dangerous proposition.
ROSSisRIGHT
|
December 03, 2012
What causes obesity is wefare... And Robeson county leads the state in welfare per capita.

When people don't work, it's because they're lazy. Then they get all the free food they can stuff down and sit around all day doing nothig.

As a matter of fact we lead or are in the top ten in every bad stat available... my goodness.

I told you we should make it a crime to be poor, and lock up people who break that law. Remove all the poor people from Robeson county and this would be a wonderful place to live.
dark
|
December 05, 2012
@ RossisRight, I think if any one did some research on socio-economic conditoins and ones weight you will see why a persons weight is affected. Those with less income are more likely to be obese (becuase they are buying cheaper food, fast food, etc.) and those of higher economic statues prepare their foods at home, by organic, and eat better balanced meals (they are not buying off the $1 menu).

I don't think it is a crime to be poor, who is to say that something one day, doesn't knock you or anyone of us to needing some type of government assistance. Rome wasn't built in a day and so was our saving accounts.

Many of those individual do work that are on welfare - such as single mothers/fathers, elderly, etc. Please don't be judgemental or put all those in one pot. Becuase what you have said does not apply to each and everyone that is on welfare or receivng some type of government assistance.

Take the time to research please. Here is an article for you - http://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/gender-race/food-stamps-gender-obesity

You will find some great research is being done by medical universitys as well as the American Medical Association.

ROSSisRIGHT
|
December 05, 2012
Dark: 1) The poor don't buy "cheaper foods", they get their food for free, EBT card. It's us that are paying that eat a lot of "dollar menu" food. But then we roll out of bed at the crack of dawn to WORK, which burns calories.

2) On government assistance, I never said "ALL". But a vast, vast majority of the ones riding the system fit my description, Mr. Excuse Maker.

3) I could care less what some government funded university says about anything. They get their money for those studies from the GOVERNMENT. The study will reveal exactly what the government wants them to reveal. Ask a closet conservative who is employed by a university, how studies have preset guidlines. They will reveal what is EXPECTED by government,(only).

4) Again, being poor causes "fill in the blank if it's bad". This is why we need to just outlaw poverty. Make it a crime and lot of society ills will be avoided. Crime, obesity,drop outs,welfare,drug use,marriage problems,adultery,rape,smoke cigarettes,seat belt use, speeding, dui,bad manners, no tips,high insurance,emergency room visits with no means to pay, addiction to video games/gambling/lottery, etc, just to name a few off the top of my head. All those bad statistics are influenced by being poor. Not "all", but a dang high percentage buddy.

Like I said, they get free food. Why would they not get the "good kind" if it's free? Answer: Because they are poor! And poor people do stupid stuff, that's why. Either outlaw being poor, or out law stupidity. One'll take care of the other, so either is fine with most of us out here who HAVE TO eat from the dollar menu a lot more time than they do.

Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: