Fatcow Icon
More jobs eliminated under budget proposal in Fairmont
by Adelina Shee
Staff writer
Town Manager Linda Vause
Town Manager Linda Vause
slideshow

FAIRMONT — The town manager on Tuesday added two more jobs that would be eliminated under her budget proposal, bringing the number to 12 of people who would lose work under the plan. Nine of the positions are part-time.

Linda Vause made the presentation during a second budget workshop, saying that a loss of revenue is forcing the elimination of positions. She had previously recommended eliminating two full-time positions and eight part-time positions in Communications.

Vause on Tuesday recommended replacing one full-time police officer with two part-time employees. According to Vause, the town would to save about $11,145 annually by not having to pay the benefits of a full-time position.

Vause also suggested eliminating a part-time crossing guard position at Rosenwald Elementary School, which would save about $5,000 a year.

Vause has suggested turning Communications and Tax Collections over to the county, and said the affected employees would have a good chance to be hired by that government.

“Communications has been in discussions for several years,” Vause said. “They’re all understanding — they understand where the town’s coming from.”

During the first budget workshop on May 28, Vause proposed eliminating eight part-time positions, which she said were the equivalent of one full-time position.

Vause said the elimination of one full-time officer and the crossing-guard would bring the budget deficit down to $400.

Mayor Charles Kemp said that the town was left with no choice but to make tough cuts.

“Until this year I had mixed feelings about it because you get used to having dispatching 24 hours a day,” Kemp said, “but budgetary issues had popped up now and we’re having to save money wherever we can — this is probably the easiest route.”

Vause said that the town would be able to save about $70,000 in the General Fund during the 2014-2015 fiscal year based on her recommendations.

“2014, 2015 looks brighter,” she said.

Kemp said that the Board of Commissioners still has to discuss details of the budget before it votes on the plan. The budget takes effect July 1.

“We’re still early into the budget process,” Kemp said. “We have several more meetings, but the board is in agreement that there has to be something done if we cannot find any additional revenue.”

Vause’s $1.2 million budget plan keeps the tax rate of 73 cents for every $100 of property, maintains fees, does not include a cost-of-living increase or any capital projects.

A public hearing for the proposed budget is scheduled for the board’s next meeting, on June 13.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Reunions for June 9, 2013
Family reunions: Jakie Locklear Family Reunion will be held at 12:30 p.m. on July 13 in the fell...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 89 89 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Religion briefs for June 9, 2013
Ongoing Freedom Christian Fellowship holds its celebration service Sundays at 10 a.m.; prayer Mo...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 85 85 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
What's Happening for June 9, 2013
Monday Kayaking trip: The Lumber River State Park will hold a guided sunset kayak trip down the ...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 89 89 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
"Focused" New Release By David Spencer
The “musical melting pot” David Spencer encountered while studying music at North Carolina Centra...
May 23, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 90 90 recommendations | email to a friend
full story

Happy 236th
Thousands of people were dazzled by the fireworks display at the annual Lumberton Family Fourth celebration at the Lumberton High School football stadium on Tuesday. Many watched the display from parking lots and sidewalks around town and from their own front yards. Before the show, attendees were treated to a performance by the Carolina Breakers, and a stunt by the Army Rangers, who parachuted onto the football field.

News
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More News
Sports
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Sports
Opinion
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Opinion
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?