Fatcow Icon
Senate bill eases gun restrictions
by Chris Kardish
Associated Press
Sen. Buck Newton
Sen. Buck Newton
slideshow

RALEIGH — A measure that lets people carry concealed firearms in more places and repeals a requirement to get a license to buy a handgun tentatively passed the North Carolina Senate Wednesday.

The Senate version broadens the scope of a bill that already passed the House. Democrats say the measure encourages more gun violence. Republicans counter that the bill protects responsible gun owners from criminals.

The Senate’s changes allow concealed-carry permit holders to store weapons in locked cars on the campus of any public university or school. It also clarifies state law to say permit holders can carry their firearms on trails, other passive recreation areas and playgrounds.

It keeps the House provision allowing concealed-carry permit holders to take weapons to places where alcohol is served or events that charge admission as long as an owner doesn’t expressly forbid it. But the Senate’s changes also add parades and funeral processions to the places people can take concealed weapons legally.

Police chiefs from the University of North Carolina system oppose the change, fearing car break-ins and other activity will lead to a proliferation of gun violence.

Also under the Senate bill, people could buy handguns without first obtaining a license from a county sheriff. Records of concealed-carry permits issued and weapons sales would not be open to the public.

The bill’s backers argue it balances new safeguards and penalties with expansions of Second Amendment freedoms. The bill includes a number of tougher gun-related penalties and requires local clerks of court to report mental health findings to a national criminal background-check database.

Sen. Buck Newton, R-Wilson and the bill’s Senate sponsor, called the license change an effort to modernize a Jim Crow era law that impedes law-abiding citizens. He argues the public-records provision prevents disclosures intended to “embarrass or intimidate” gun owners.

Sen. Martin Nesbitt, D-Buncombe, and other Democrats argued many good reasons exist for public access to concealed-carry information, from research to domestic violence proceedings.

“There are reasons these things are on the books, and it’s not to punish someone or embarrass someone,” he said. “I’m not embarrassed that I’m a gun owner.”

Attorney General Roy Cooper opposes the repeal of the license requirement, which forces people to obtain a permit from a county sheriff. He argues it removes a key part of the screening process.

Sen. Ralph Hise, R-Mitchell, said the law was originally intended to prevent black people from obtaining firearms and today creates a loophole that allows people later convicted of crimes to reuse the same license to obtain guns.

Sen. Ellie Kinnaird, D-Orange, unsuccessfully pushed for an amendment requiring owners to publicly post whether they allow firearms. She argued the bill is out of step with broader public opinion in North Carolina.

Republicans maintained that safety is enhanced with concealed-carry permit holders taking weapons to more places.

“Bad guys don’t pay attention to our statutes,” said Sen. Andrew Brock, R-Davie. “Law-abiding people need this legislation.”

The bill will likely return for a final vote today. The House will have to approve the Senate’s changes.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
sagehopper
|
June 14, 2013
A good move..All licensing does, generally speaking, is generate cash. It also puts a barrier , however small, or large, in front of our Second Amendment rights, by making gun ownership a thing that could be up to some bureaucrat. I don't have a bit of problem with background checks, within reason. But if that is used, like they are for gun shows, gun shop purchases, etc..have the buyer's mental health as part of the deal..If he had EVER committed a crime before, and a mental health problem was part of that crime, according to the judge or jury..put it on his record. The reason I say this, all of those mass shootings over the last few years had mental disease diagnosed. And criminals do not buy their guns from a source that wd institute a background check. Or they steal the weapons in burglaries, or buy from a friend's car trunk. Not an open, legal purchase. As a former SEAL, I am proficient in all manner of weapons, but my wife is a novice at best. Anything that gives me, or her, an edge in a 'touchy" situation is a welcome thing. Being a victim without means of self protection is not an option I want.
Reunions for June 9, 2013
Family reunions: Jakie Locklear Family Reunion will be held at 12:30 p.m. on July 13 in the fell...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 89 89 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Religion briefs for June 9, 2013
Ongoing Freedom Christian Fellowship holds its celebration service Sundays at 10 a.m.; prayer Mo...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 85 85 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
What's Happening for June 9, 2013
Monday Kayaking trip: The Lumber River State Park will hold a guided sunset kayak trip down the ...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 89 89 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
"Focused" New Release By David Spencer
The “musical melting pot” David Spencer encountered while studying music at North Carolina Centra...
May 23, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 90 90 recommendations | email to a friend
full story

Happy 236th
Thousands of people were dazzled by the fireworks display at the annual Lumberton Family Fourth celebration at the Lumberton High School football stadium on Tuesday. Many watched the display from parking lots and sidewalks around town and from their own front yards. Before the show, attendees were treated to a performance by the Carolina Breakers, and a stunt by the Army Rangers, who parachuted onto the football field.

News
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More News
Sports
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Sports
Opinion
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Opinion
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?