Fatcow Icon
Like King, Obama faces a battle
Jan 26, 2013 | 1798 views | 6 6 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Now that the hill of mud the GOP piled on Hillary Clinton has been climbed through with such bright colors remaining in place, and she remains plenty popular enough to win the White House in 2016; and now that American women can fight in combat; and now that homosexuals and lesbians are getting human rights, and Mary Jo White has been called upon to give the blues to Wall Street crooks, we can see much has changed in the past half-century.

We also know that Americans will gladly find any excuse to party. And Monday’s inauguration was surely as good a reason for celebration as any.

But even as we partook in the festivities, we also should have reflected on the weighty significance of the occasion. After all, Martin Luther King Jr. and President Barack Obama were connected by more than a national holiday on one hand and an official ceremony on the other.

For some Americans, there was a sentimentalized feeling of victory, a sense that what King started some half-century ago, Obama has finished — and that we have truly “made it” as a nation. For others, mired as they are in hopeless cynicism, King failed to meet the standards laid out by the Black Power rabble-rousers of his day, while Obama is complacent in his own right, having become a lap dog of Wall Street and other special interests.

Both of these extremes miss the point.

On Sept. 15, 1963, four little black girls were killed when the 16th Street Baptist Church was bombed in Birmingham, Ala., by rednecks.

In his eulogy three days later, King called the slain children “martyred heroines of a holy crusade for freedom and human dignity,” adding that “the innocent blood of these little girls may well serve as a redemptive force.”

King even ventured to posit that “this tragic event may cause the white South to come to terms with its conscience.”

In the years that followed, the forces of segregation were defeated once and for all. King had been right. Those four poor girls did not die in vain.

Now, Obama is witnessing something similar happening in America in the wake of Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

This, too, was a slaughter of innocents — and it, too, was a sickening wake-up call. I have a feeling that the present administration knows that Americans are coming together, growing up, ready “to transform the negative extremes of a dark past into the positive extremes of a bright future,” to borrow from King’s eulogy again.

Across lines of difference and division, the president is leading Americans determined not to let the National Rifle Association become a contemporary version of the Ku Klux Klan.

Though the two are, of course, miles apart in substance and creed, they share similarly reactionary convictions — the sweaty belief that the government is a force always to be resisted, never to be trusted.

That progress takes a long time is a certainty. There is much suffering, much opposition, much resistance from those in positions of wealth and power who would rather have things stay as they are.

King had the long game in mind, as does Obama. Both have used their eloquence to rouse Americans from their sleep, to push them toward an understanding of who we can be as a nation. Both have used their sincerity and decency to battle the forces of paranoia and fear that bay at them like hounds.

King lived to see the civil-rights movement initiate real change in the American South and set the pace for the rest of the country. He did not, of course, live to see Obama inaugurated, but that, too, is part of his legacy. And now the president has his own battles to fight.

Stanley Crouch can be reached by email at crouch.stanley@gmail.com.



Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
TravestyOfJustice
|
January 27, 2013
Sad... To even mention the name of Dr. King in the same sentence, nay the same article, as this individual that america has so ignorantly chose to elect for four more years of prosperity genocide, is blasphemous. Sad... Just Saying...
DaveD
|
January 28, 2013
Totally agree
sagehopper
|
January 26, 2013
Whatcha been smokin', Stan? Hillary will not name you as her Press Secrwetary if she ever was successful in getting into another office...So strop kissing her behind. You are just another "useful idiot" to her.
BBBD
|
January 26, 2013
I have much to say about this column, but not much time right now. I'll leave this thought, quoting Crouch's new hero, Hillary.

Four girls will killed by "rednecks." What difference does it make!? What difference does it make if they were killed by rednecks with an agenda or rednecks who happened to just be walking by? WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

According to Crouch's hero, Hillary, it doesn't matter why four Americans are killed. It's irrelevant and meaningless. Good luck to the Hillary 2016 campaign.
ReallyRobeson?
|
January 27, 2013
Dems need to pay attention to this commenter. Benghazi will be OVER with when and only when Hillary and the Admin. fess up to who knew what when and why the decision was made that lying was the best option.

I support them in many areas but won't excuse wrong behavior.

Admitting what happened, letting blame land where it belongs and moving on is the only way this won't hang around Hillary's neck for the rest of her life. The deceased and the Country deserves this.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: