Fatcow Icon
Schools oppose bill giving property control to county
by Bob Shiles
Staff writer
Mar 13, 2013 | 112519 views | 15 15 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
East Robeson Elementary School students are recognized as the first place winners for the second and third grades during Tuesday's meeting of the Public Schools of Robeson County school board. Tanglewood came in second and Green Grove Elementary schools came in third. | Bob Shiles | The Robesonian
East Robeson Elementary School students are recognized as the first place winners for the second and third grades during Tuesday's meeting of the Public Schools of Robeson County school board. Tanglewood came in second and Green Grove Elementary schools came in third. | Bob Shiles | The Robesonian
slideshow

Bob Shiles

Staff writer

LUMBERTON — The Board of Education for the Public Schools of Robeson County school board joined other school officials across the state in opposing proposed legislation that would allow county commissions to “unilaterally seize ownership and control of school property from local school boards.”

Board members on Tuesday voted unanimously to oppose Senate Bill 236, a bill that would allow counties to elect by resolution to assume control over some or all of school property powers. School property powers that could be affected by the law include: ownership; siting; acquisition; construction; equipping; expanding; improving; repairing; and renovating.

Grady Hunt, the attorney for the Public Schools of Robeson County school board, told board members that the “troubling” aspect of the bill centers around the freedom county commissions would have to determine what property powers now in the hands of local boards they wish to control.

“They can pick and choose control of the powers they desire,” he said. “This (bill) allows them not to have to take complete control, but allows for just partial control.”

In a letter to County Manager Ricky Harris, Hunt said that the “powers of school system control and supervision are statutorily vested in local boards of education. Property ownership is a fundamental element of control and supervisory powers.”

“Transferring basic powers of school property to county commissions would obscure the lines of authority between local boards of education and county commissions,” he said. “Where lines of authority are dulled, accountability to the public decreases.”

The board met without Randy Lawson, who is ill and hospitalized. Severio Kerns, who is recuperating from heart surgery, was also absent from the meeting as was John Campbell.

In other business, the board on Tuesday:

— Approved up to an additional $15,000 for repairs of the floor to the old Townsend School gym. Erica Setzer, the school district’s chief financial officer, said that $63,000 has already been allocated for repairs to the gym but not spent.

Late last year, the board authorized its attorney to draw up a lease proposal so the old gym can be handed over to the town of Maxton to be used for a community center. The lease has not yet been executed.

— Approved money to make roof repairs at South Robeson High School. Setzer said that the cost of work on the roof of the school’s main classroom building will exceed $375,000.

— Approved an additional $400 to be added to the athletic fund for each of the county’s 13 middle schools to help pay for an additional official for softball games. Currently, there is only one umpire for each game.

— Approved funding for school district employees to work a four-day work week in the summer.

— Approved about $107,000 to complete the work on Phase I of the Lumberton High School athletic complex. This includes expenses associated with parking lot paving, work on the soccer field, bleachers, and lighting.

At Tuesday’s meeting, the board also recognized students and employees for a number of achievements. These included the Battle of the Books winners for the second and third grades; the state Science, Math and Technology Teacher of the Year for grades kindergarten through eighth; the Future Cities competition winner; and Students of Excellence.

The Robesonian will publish this information on its Education page as soon as resources and space allow.



Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
fun
|
March 24, 2013
As a parent. Why should Lumberton get all the money, when my child doesn't even have books at Purnell!!
Imright
|
March 14, 2013
8pointbuck

Yes I go there, but Purnell don't matter I guess....I guess we will have to deal with what we've!!!

Obviously everybody knows what schools is on top an be treated better than the other...purnell will have to be severly damaged before they spend a dollar there but schools such as Lumberton if something mess up it's fixed immediately but Purnell is put on the bottom of the wait list
8pointbuck
|
March 14, 2013
lilmac727, what winning team are you talking about? Swett or Lumberton does not have a "winning" team, Lumberton may beat those easy non-conference teams but as soon as conference rolls around nothing. Swett has been down as of late but until last year they owned Lumberton on the field. So no winning team between those two schools.
BBBD
|
March 14, 2013
I'm pretty sure they're referring to the picture of the kids who on Battle of the Books.
BBBD
|
March 14, 2013
I'm pretty sure they're referring to the picture of the kids who on Battle of the Books.
lilmac727
|
March 14, 2013
It was the Battle of the Books team. My original question was not posted.
Imright
|
March 13, 2013
8pointbuck

Idk if you go to Purnell but I totally agree....Swett has problems that needs to be fixed I guess we're at the bottom of the wait list but of course look who would be at the top
Imright
|
March 13, 2013
Really Lumberton?

Purnell Swett needs more work than Lumberton. When do they ever get help? Yes you can spend the money here and there but why waste money on paving roads? Students needs books at Purnell the books are outdated instead of wasting money on roads and the outside what happened in the inside is more important and the money should be spent there...and I wonder why we are 1% college ready
BBBD
|
March 13, 2013
What a terrible idea for a bill/law. The problem with public education is that so many people who haven't the first clue about education are the primary decision makers. Putting more clueless people in charge of school property benefits no one.
ReallyRobeson?
|
March 13, 2013
It reads like he was serious but attorney Hunt's comment about "accountability to the public" has me in stitches. Has he bumped his head recently? THIS IS ROBESON!!!!!!!!!! Officials do as they want with NO accountability to the public. Prediction here though, next election's gonna shake up some things here especially if the Robesonian staff led by Mr. Douglas keeps the light on these "leaders".

I enjoy the Sopranos but compared to our organized crime masquerading as public service, the NJ mafia depicted on that show are not only fictitious but rank amateurs.
orighawk
|
March 13, 2013
Wait wait wait...they want the already out of control spending commissioners to have access to more money and power? Seems they should have their own "houses" in order before given any other responsibilities.
8pointbuck
|
March 13, 2013
"Phase 1 of the Lumberton Athletic Complex" Purnell Swett has tried for years to get the area next to the field house paved or graded or something and nothing is ever done. Last year they brought out two loades of crush and run and thats it, not a fix at all. All thats gonna do is mess the lawn mower blades up in the spring. Im happy for lumberton but its just a big mud hole next to the field house at swett, something needs to be done there also.
lilmac727
|
March 13, 2013
Thank you for posting the picture of the winning team.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: